Woman with Covid should be allowed to die weeks after giving birth, judge rules (Report)

Coronavirus: Sask. reports 173 new COVID-19 cases, 3 more deaths
Coronavirus: Sask. reports 173 new COVID-19 cases, 3 more deaths

A woman in her early 30s on life support with Covid-19 should be allowed to die against her family’s wishes, a judge has ruled.

The woman, who has an underlying health condition, gave birth to a baby a month ago and is in an induced coma.

Mr Justice Hayden ruled that doctors can lawfully stop providing life-support treatment to the woman.

A specialist told him that everything had been tried and the woman’s chances of recovery were “zero”.

The judge considered the case at an urgent virtual hearing in the Court of Protection, where issues relating to people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions for themselves are analysed, late on Tuesday.

He said the woman, a Muslim who was married and also had a three-year-old daughter, could not be named.

Bosses at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust had asked him to rule that ending life-support treatment would be in the woman’s best interests.

The woman’s husband and sister said she should be given more time and treatment should continue.

They said Muslims believed that only God could end life.

But the judge said evidence showed that doctors were no longer preserving the woman’s life, but prolonging her death.

He concluded that ending treatment would be in her best interests and said she should be allowed to die with dignity.

Mr Justice Hayden said the woman’s “life and hopes” had been extinguished by “this insidious virus”, and a young family “split apart prematurely”.

“This family is seeking a miracle,” he said. “This is a very young mother in circumstances of almost-unspeakable sadness.”

He added: “It is a tragedy of an almost-unimaginable dimension.”

Mr Justice Hayden said doctors had prepared a palliative care plan and the woman’s family would be able to see her.

“The objective is not to shorten her life,” he added. “(But) to avoid the prolongation of her death.”

The judge was told that the woman suffered from Addison’s disease – a rare disorder of glands that produce essential hormones.

He heard that she had developed Covid-19 while at home and been rushed to hospital a month ago when 32 weeks’ pregnant.

Doctors had delivered her son by caesarean section shortly after she was admitted.

They said her pancreas had ceased to function and one lung had “died”.

Previous articleCoronavirus: The latest numbers on COVID-19 in Canada for Wednesday, Feb. 24, 2021
Next articleColumn: Tiger Woods survives but his career might not, Report
3390 Hillcrest Lane Irvine, CA 92714 [email protected] 949-851-3378


  1. That should be the familys right to decide.Judges should not have the right to interfere inthis sitruation. we are still America not a communist country.I am sick of judges interfereing in health decisions. docters seem tothink they are god & i resent them 100%. i have seen where they have allowed infants to die even though there was a chance they could suvive. please leaveour rights alone


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.